Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perrow, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organizing for Environmental Destruction

Charles Perrow

Yale University

Organizations are the most intensive and effective environmental destroyers. Organizations in a competitive unregulated market such as the United States and emerging Asian and former Soviet countries are more likely to be destructive because externalizing environmental costs increases profits and competitiveness, but organizational properties encourage destructive practices even in command economies. In the United States, a fully wage-dependent workforce makes whistle-blowing risky, structural interests of employees limits the reform efforts of even an environmentally sensitive executive, decentralization limits accountability, consultants and public relations staffs are available to reassure executives that trade-offs are in society's interests and that regulations mean waste, and organizations socialize all employees, making whistle-blowing even rarer.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 10, No. 1, 66-72 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0921810697101009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
R. Shwom
Strengthening Sociological Perspectives on Organizations and the Environment
Organization Environment, September 1, 2009; 22(3): 271 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. Oliver
The Treadmill of Production Under NAFTA: Multilateral Trade, Environmental Regulation, and National Sovereignty
Organization Environment, March 1, 2005; 18(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. Perrow
A Personal Note on Normal Accidents
Organization Environment, March 1, 2004; 17(1): 9 - 14.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
R. P. Gephart Jr.
Normal Risk: Technology, Sense Making, and Environmental Disasters
Organization Environment, March 1, 2004; 17(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]