Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaczmarski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperrider, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constructionist Leadership in the Global Relational Age

The Case of the Mountain Forum

Kathryn M. Kaczmarski

Case Western Reserve University

David L. Cooperrider

Case Western Reserve University

Many people perceive mountains as powerful symbols of pristine wilderness and natural strength. But these perceptions belie the vulnerabilities of mountain environments: All over the world, expanding economic pressures are degrading mountain ecosystems, while confronting mountain peoples with increasing cultural assimilation, poverty, and political disempowerment. In this article, we trace the human response to the growing global agenda for change in relation to the world's precious mountain environments, beginning with the global regime formation associated with Chapter 13 of Agenda 21 at the 1992 Earth Summit and resulting in the construction of a new worldwide organization, the Mountain Forum. In particular, the study builds on the regime formation literature surrounding the three widely acknowledged leadership types-structural, entrepreneurial, and intellectual-and proposes constructionist leadership as a fourth complementary but missing leadership type. Through grounded theory analysis of this unique and successful global change organizing effort, propositions are developed about a kind of leadership that enables productive connections, at the deepest levels of belief and method, among paradigms or cultures of inquiry. Helping to expand our understanding of the organization dimensions of global change, this study concludes that the most challenging task in global regime formation and organization development is the bridging of diverse systems of intelligibility, allowing for establishment of a worldwide metaculture of knowing.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 10, No. 3, 235-258 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0921810697103001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
M. Dreiling, N. Lougee, R. Jonna, and T. Nakamura
Environmental Organizations and Communication Praxis: A Study of Communication Strategies Among a National Sample of Environmental Organizations
Organization Environment, December 1, 2008; 21(4): 420 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
D. L. Cooperrider and G. S. Khalsa
The Organization Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
Organization Environment, December 1, 1997; 10(4): 331 - 341.