Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srikantia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bilimoria, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Isomorphism in Organization and Management Theory

The Case of Research on Sustainability

Param Srikantia

Case Western Reserve University

Diana Bilimoria

Case Western Reserve University

The article highlights the consequences of isomorphism in organization studies by arguing that current theorizing and research in the discipline often unwittingly legitimize the institutional practices of mainstream business organization. By contrasting the literatures on sustainability in the business and nonbusiness literatures, the authors demonstrate that in organization studies, isomorphic pressures transform the connotation of sustainability to make it consonant with a dominant corporate model. The authors argue that subservience to the institutional models implicit in the conduct of mainstream business organization traps the discipline in a self-perpetuating cycle of normative and mimetic influences, leading scholars and practitioners to mutually reinforce and sustain institutional forms compatible with their jointly held belief systems. The results of the comparative review of the literatures on sustainability is expressed in six observations suggesting a more radical posture among scholars to enable the field to achieve its full potential for critical, generative, and reflexive scholarship.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 10, No. 4, 384-406 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/192181069701000404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
T. J. Kallio and P. Nordberg
The Evolution of Organizations and Natural Environment Discourse: Some Critical Remarks
Organization Environment, December 1, 2006; 19(4): 439 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. Walck
Healing the Divided Mind: Land as an Integrating Concept for Organizations and the Natural Environment
Organization Environment, June 1, 2004; 17(2): 170 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
C. Driscoll and A. Crombie
Stakeholder Legitimacy Management and the Qualified Good Neighbor: The Case of Nova Nada and JDI
Business Society, December 1, 2001; 40(4): 442 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]