Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dreiling, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Environmental Movement Organizations and Political Strategy

Tactical Conflicts Over NAFTA

Michael Dreiling

Brian Wolf

University of Oregon

The authors introduce the study of material-organizational dependencies into research on political differences in the environmental movement. Presently, the study of disparities in the environmental movement focuses on the ideological differences among major environmental groups to the exclusion of some very glaring discrepancies in the material-organizational context of these groups. The authors present a conceptual model of organizational differences among several U.S. environmental movement organizations to explain variation in their political behavior in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) fight (1991-1993). The case of NAFTA offers a useful context given the volatility of environmental movement politics at the time, the range of issues forced to the surface in major groups, and the ultimate movement split that the politics over NAFTA engendered. It is evident that the split between pro-NAFTA and anti-NAFTA environmental groups stems in large part from substantial differences in both the ideological frames and material-organizational alliances formed among these groups.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 14, No. 1, 34-54 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026601141002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
D. J. Salazar
Saving Nature and Seeking Justice: Environmental Activists in the Pacific Northwest
Organization Environment, June 1, 2009; 22(2): 230 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
F. G. Delfin Jr. and S.-Y. Tang
Foundation Impact on Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations: The Grantees' Perspective
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2008; 37(4): 603 - 625.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
M. Dreiling, N. Lougee, R. Jonna, and T. Nakamura
Environmental Organizations and Communication Praxis: A Study of Communication Strategies Among a National Sample of Environmental Organizations
Organization Environment, December 1, 2008; 21(4): 420 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
F. H. Buttel
Environmental Sociology and the Explanation of Environmental Reform
Organization Environment, September 1, 2003; 16(3): 306 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. Carmin and D. B. Balser
Selecting Repertoires of Action in Environmental Movement Organizations: An Interpretive Approach
Organization Environment, December 1, 2002; 15(4): 365 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]