This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beamish, T. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Environmental Hazard and Institutional Betrayal

Lay-Public Perceptions of Risk in the San Luis Obispo County Oil Spill

University of California, Davis

In this in-depth case analysis of the massive Guadalupe Dunes oil field spill in California’s San Luis Obispo County, it is argued that understanding community members’ interpretations of risk requires attention to the broader social and historical contexts within which interpretation occurs. This conceptualization differs from conventional approaches to studying risk that tend to treat the phenomena more narrowly, as discrete "variables" that can be measured objectively by experts or that can be assessed as reactions of lay people to single, isolated events. The main finding from this study is that community members’ interpretations of the risks posed by the Guadalupe Dunes spill (the largest in U.S. history) were affected profoundly by the social and environmental history of the local area. In this case, perceptions of present and future risk associated with the massive contamination of Guadalupe Dunes grew more from impressions of the way corporate and governmental institutions in the area mishandled this and previous oil-related hazards than from fear of health risks associated with the discrete Guadalupe Dunes event. Community members reacted to the threat from the immediate event but also experienced a more encompassing sense of risk associated with a perceived breach of trust on the part of corporate and governmental institutions. From their impression of institutional neglect, misconduct, and cover-up, they developed a sense of institutional failure and feelings of betrayal and anger. As this case suggests, when a complete breakdown in trust of this kind occurs, community members’ perceptions of and reactions to risk can be seen as "rational" but cannot be understood as merely calculative responses to the physical hazards associated only with the immediate, discrete event. By reporting how community members and other members of the lay public experienced this more encompassing sense of risk, this study illustrates the critical importance of context in risk research. Implications for developing theories of risk perception are discussed.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 14, No. 1, 5-33 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026601141001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Shwom Strengthening Sociological Perspectives on Organizations and the Environment Organization Environment, September 1, 2009; 22(3): 271 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Walton Site the Mine in Our Backyard! Discursive Strategies of Community Stakeholders in an Environmental Conflict in New Zealand Organization Environment, June 1, 2007; 20(2): 177 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Carolan The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment: Rethinking How We Assess and Mitigate Environmental Threats Organization Environment, March 1, 2007; 20(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Norgaard "We Don't Really Want to Know": Environmental Justice and Socially Organized Denial of Global Warming in Norway Organization Environment, September 1, 2006; 19(3): 347 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. K. Marshall and W. S. Goldstein Managing the Environmental Legitimation Crisis Organization Environment, June 1, 2006; 19(2): 214 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Davidson and S. Frickel Understanding Environmental Governance: A Critical Review Organization Environment, December 1, 2004; 17(4): 471 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. Gephart Jr. Normal Risk: Technology, Sense Making, and Environmental Disasters Organization Environment, March 1, 2004; 17(1): 20 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. H. Buttel Environmental Sociology and the Explanation of Environmental Reform Organization Environment, September 1, 2003; 16(3): 306 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. R. Berry Organizing Against Multinational Corporate Power In Cancer Alley: The Activist Community as Primary Stakeholder Organization Environment, March 1, 2003; 16(1): 3 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]