|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory
Institutional Efficacy, Case Study Evidence, Units of Analysis, and the Pace of Eco-Efficiency
Richard York
University of Oregon, rfyork{at}darkwing.uoregon.edu
Eugene A. Rosa
Washington State University
We raise four challenges to the claim of ecological modernization theory (EMT) that continued modernization is necessary for ecological sustainability. First, EMT needs to go beyond merely demonstrating that societies modify their institutions in reaction to environmental problems and show that such modifications lead to ecological improvements. Second, EMT must show that late stages of modernizing processes lead to the ecological transformation of production and consumption at relatively high frequency. Third, EMT must demonstrate that industries or firms that are reducing their direct impact on the environment are not contributing to the expansion of negative impacts by other industries or firms. Fourth, EMT must show not only that economies are becoming more resource efficient but also that the pace of increase in efficiency exceeds the pace of increase in overall production. In this article, we review the existing evidence and find that EMT has insufficiently addressed these four issues.
Key Words: Ecological Modernization Theory • case study evidence • eco-efficiency • STIRPAT research program • death penalty fallacy
Organization & Environment, Vol. 16, No. 3,
273-288 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026603256299
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
R. Shwom
Strengthening Sociological Perspectives on Organizations and the Environment
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2009;
22(3):
271 - 292.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Rosa
Review of Chris Jordan's Photographic and Computer Image Exhibition, Running the Numbers, Curated by Chris Bruce, Director of the Washington State University Museum of Art
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2009;
22(3):
327 - 337.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K Jorgenson
Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, the Mitigating Influence of Institutional and Civil Society Factors, and Relationships Between Industrial Pollution and Human Health: A Panel Study of Less-Developed Countries
Organization Environment,
June 1, 2009;
22(2):
135 - 157.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Tranter and M. Lowes
Life in the Fast Lane: Environmental, Economic, and Public Health Outcomes of Motorsport Spectacles in Australia
Journal of Sport and Social Issues,
May 1, 2009;
33(2):
150 - 168.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kondoh
The Challenge of Climate Change and Energy Policies for Building a Sustainable Society in Japan
Organization Environment,
March 1, 2009;
22(1):
52 - 74.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Stubbs and C. Cocklin
Conceptualizing a "Sustainability Business Model"
Organization Environment,
June 1, 2008;
21(2):
103 - 127.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Cliath
Seeing Shades: Ecological and Socially Just Labeling
Organization Environment,
December 1, 2007;
20(4):
413 - 439.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Jorgenson
Does Foreign Investment Harm the Air We Breathe and the Water We Drink? A Cross-National Study of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Organic Water Pollution in Less-Developed Countries, 1975 to 2000
Organization Environment,
June 1, 2007;
20(2):
137 - 156.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Pulver
Making Sense of Corporate Environmentalism: An Environmental Contestation Approach to Analyzing the Causes and Consequences of the Climate Change Policy Split in the Oil Industry
Organization Environment,
March 1, 2007;
20(1):
44 - 83.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Clark and R. York
Dialectical Materialism and Nature: An Alternative to Economism and Deep Ecology
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2005;
18(3):
318 - 337.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Norgaard and R. York
Gender Equality and State Environmentalism
Gender Society,
August 1, 2005;
19(4):
506 - 522.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. J. Mol and G. Spaargaren
From Additions and Withdrawals to Environmental Flows: Reframing Debates in the Environmental Social Sciences
Organization Environment,
March 1, 2005;
18(1):
91 - 107.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Barnett
Book Review: Are Globalization and Sustainability Compatible?: A Review of the Debate Between the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Forum on Globalization
Organization Environment,
December 1, 2004;
17(4):
523 - 532.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Gould, D. N. Pellow, and A. Schnaiberg
Interrogating the Treadmill of Production: Everything You Wanted to Know about the Treadmill but Were Afraid to Ask
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2004;
17(3):
296 - 316.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. York
The Treadmill of (Diversifying) Production
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2004;
17(3):
355 - 362.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
