Organization & Environment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organization & Environment, Vol. 17, No. 3, 317-322 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026604267937

Interrogating the Treadmill of Production

Some Questions I Still Want to Know about and Am Not Afraid to Ask

Erik Olin Wright

University of Wisconsin

This commentary on "Interrogating the Treadmill of Production" by Gould, Pellow, and Schnaiberg takes up the challenge, invited by the article itself, of asking some of the questions that still seem unanswered by the model. Among the questions asked are: Why not refer to capitalism instead of the treadmill and to workers/owners instead of producers? Why is the temporal priority of production over consumption taken as its logical primacy? Why is sustainability equated with no growth? What are the specific reasons for denying that a green capitalism (a green treadmill?) is possible? Why is it that no alternative system is offered, as Marxists would offer socialism as an alternative to capitalism? What would constitute empirical evidence for/against the treadmill thesis? Arewe really running in place? It is suggested that these key questions still need to be answered if the treadmill theory is to be compelling to sociologists both inside and outside environmental sociology.

Key Words: environmental sociology • capitalism • consumption • ecological destruction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
E. Bonds
Environmental Review as Battleground: Corporate Power, Government Collusion, and Citizen Opposition to a Tire-Burning Power Plant in Rural Minnesota, U.S.A
Organization Environment, June 1, 2007; 20(2): 157 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
S. Pulver
Making Sense of Corporate Environmentalism: An Environmental Contestation Approach to Analyzing the Causes and Consequences of the Climate Change Policy Split in the Oil Industry
Organization Environment, March 1, 2007; 20(1): 44 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]