Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Judge, W. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organizational Responses to Strategic Issues Posed by the Natural Environment: An Application of Miles and Snow's Strategic Types

William Q. Judge, Jr.

University of Tennessee

Dorn M. Fowler

Brescia College

The natural environment has become a strategic issue for many firms, and the adaptive response of organizations to the pressures incurred by this issue is important to their effectiveness and survival. Using the Miles and Snow (1978) theoretical framework, this article builds a model of the relationship between strategic orientation, environmental responses, and environmental performance. Then, the authors empirically tested this model through seven hypotheses on how defenders, prospectors, and reactors are expected to respond to these pressures. In general, the results show that the firms' strategic orientations are predictive of their environmental responses. However, the predictions for the prospectors were more strongly supported by our data than were the predictions for the defenders. Interestingly, prospectors' and defenders' environmental performance advantage over reactors was most clearly shown in the area of preventing and mitigating environmental crises as opposed to going beyond minimum environmental compliance levels.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 9, No. 4, 419-447 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/108602669600900401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?