|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Getting Right with Nature
Anthropocentrism, Ecocentrism, and Theocentrism
Andrew J. Hoffman
University of Michigan
Lloyd E. Sandelands
University of Michigan
The past century has witnessed unprecedented economic growth and prosperity along with unprecedented depredations upon nature. To resolve these developments, there is debate between two moral postures. One takes a human-centered, or anthropocentric, view of our relationship to nature to emphasize the value of securing the resources needed for further development. The other takes an environment-centered, or ecocentric, view of our relationship to nature to emphasize the value of conserving her integrity and beauty. This article explores tensions underling these two views and finds that neither adequately reconciles us to nature. This article offers an alternative, theocentric view of our relationship to nature, founded upon Catholic Christianity, that reconciles in God our value for resources and nature and establishes a divine order of man and nature apart from human egoism and intentions. This article concludes with a discussion of the implications of this theocentric view for environmental policy and practice.
Key Words: God • nature • man • environmentalism • ecocentrism • anthropocentrism • theocentrism • Catholic Church • Protestant Reformation
References
- Acton Institute for the Study of Religion & Liberty. (1999). [Organization flier]. Grand Rapids, MI: Author.
- Allenby, B. (2002). Observations on the philosophic implications of earth systems engineering and management [Batten Institute Working Paper]. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
- Augustine. (1909). Confessions (E. Pussey, Trans.). New York: Collier. (Original work published 397)
- Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bazerman, M., & Hoffman, A. (1999). Sources of environmentally destructive behavior: Individual, organizational and institutional perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39-79.
- Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Bonaventure. (1978). The life of St. Francis. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
- Browning, R. (1970). Andrea del sarto. In I. Jack (Ed.), Robert Browning: Poetical works (1833-1864) (pp. 673-679). London: Oxford University Press.
- Calvin, W. (1994). The emergence of intelligence. Scientific American, 271(4), 101-107.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus. London: Hamish Hamilton.
- Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 20(1), 15-47.
- Chesterton, G. K. (1908). Orthodoxy. New York: Dodd, Mead.
- Colby, M. (1991). Environmental management in development: The evolution of paradigms. Ecological Economics, 3, 193-213.
- Crossette, B. (1998a, September 27). Kofi Anna’s astonishing facts. New York Times, pp. 4-16.
- Crossette, B. (1998b, September 13). Most consuming more, and the rich consuming much more. New York Times, p. 3.
- Cushman, J. (1998, August 15). Religious groups mount a campaign to support pact on global warming. New York Times, p. A10.
- Derr, T. (1996). Environmental ethics and Christian humanism. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
- Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology. Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith Books.
- Dowie, M. (1995). Losing ground: American environmentalism at the close of the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being in the world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dubos, R. (1976). Symbiosis between earth & humankind. Science, 193, 459-462.[Free Full Text]
- Egri, C., & Pinfield, L. (1996). Organizations and the biosphere: Ecologies and environments. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 459-483). London: Sage.
- Evernden, N. (1985). The natural alien. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
- Forbes, L. (2004). A vision for cultivating a nation: Gifford Pinchot’s "The fight for conservation." Organization & Environment, 17(2), 226-231.[Abstract]
- Gaines, J., & Jermier, J. (2000). Animal inequality and organizations: Introduction. Organization & Environment, 13(4), 426-428.[Free Full Text]
- Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J., & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Goldman, A. (1990, April 23). Focus on humans, Cardinal cautions. New York Times p. B12.
- Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-76.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hoffman, A., Gillespie, J., Moore, D., Wade-Benzoni, K., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1999). A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254-1276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hott, L. (Director), & Garey, D. (Director). (1989). The wilderness idea: John Muir, Gifford Pinchot and the first great battle for wilderness [Video documentary]. Santa Monica, CA: Direct Cinema Limited.
- Jonas, H. (1973). Technology and responsibility: Reflections on the new tasks of ethics. Social Research, 40, 31-54.
- Kennedy, P. (1993). Preparing for the twenty-first century. New York: Random House.
- Kloehn, S. (1997, February 10). Evangelicals see beasts as blessed by their creator. The Chicago Tribune, pp. A1, A16.
- Kuyper, A. (1943). Lectures on Calvinism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
- Leibniz, G. (1976). Philosophical papers and letters of Leibniz (L. E. Loemker, Trans., Ed.). Boston: Reidel. (Original work published 1695)
- Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lewis, C. S. (1953). The abolition of man. New York: Macmillan.
- Ligouri Publications. (1994). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Ligouri, MO: Author.
- McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. New York: Random House.
- Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
- Merton, T. (1963a, April 3). Lecture: St. Thomas: The importance of creation in God’s view (Cassette Recroding No. 95A). Louisville, KY: Thomas Merton Studies Center.
- Merton, T. (1963b, January 12). Letter to Rachel Carson. Louisville, KY: Thomas Merton Studies Center.
- National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). Health, United States, 2004. Washington DC: Department of Health & Human Services.
- Pascal, B. (1966). Pensees (A. Krailsheimer, Trans.). London: Penguin. (Original work published 1670)
- Passmore, J. (1974). Man’s responsibility for nature: Ecological problems and Western traditions. New York: Scribner.
- Pope John Paul II. (1990). The ecological crisis a common responsibility, message of His Holiness for the celebration of the World Day of Peace January 1, 1990. Retrieved March 14, 2005, from http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/JP900101.HTM
- Pope John Paul II. (1991). Encyclical letter centesimus annus. Boston: Pauline.
- Pope John Paul II. (1995). Encyclical letter evangelium vitae. Boston: Pauline.
- Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
- Presbyterians ratify teaching on sex, ecology. (1991, June 9). The Boston Globe, p. 4.
- Sandelands, L. (2005). Man and nature in God. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
- Schaeffer, F. A. (1970). Pollution and the death of man: The Christian view of ecology. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.
- Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
- Shanahan, D. (1992). Toward a genealogy of individualism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
- Sirico, R. (1994, August 29). The greening of American faith. National Review, p. 47.
- Sirico, R. (1999, March 4). Beware grafting environmental ideology on to orthodox faith. The Detroit News, p. A10.
- Stackhouse, M. (2001). The spirit and modern authority. In M. Stackhouse, D. Browning, & P. Paris (Eds.), God and globalization: Part 2 (pp. 21-35). Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse.
- Stammer, L. (1997, November 9). Harming the environment is sinful, prelate says. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
- Starke, L. (2004). State of the world 2004: A Worldwatch Institute Report on progress toward a sustainable society. New York: Norton.
- Steinfels, P. (1996, January 31). Evangelical group defends endangered-species laws as a modern Noah’s ark. The New York Times, p. C19.
- Stipp, D. (2004, February 9). The Pentagon’s weather nightmare. Fortune, pp. 99-108.
- Thomas, W. (2002). Rio’s unfinished business: American enterprise and the journey toward environmentally sustainable globalization. Environmental Law Reporter, 32, 10873-10955.
- United Nations. (2001). Global status of biological diversity [E/CN.17/2001/PC/18]. New York: United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development.
- Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Scribner. (Original work published 1904)
- Weis, M. (1992, Autumn). Living beings call us to reflective living. Merton Seasonal, pp.4-9.
- White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203-1207.[Free Full Text]
- World Business Council on Sustainable Development. (1997). Exploring sustainable development: WBCSD global scenarios. London: Author.
- World Resources Institute. (1994). World resources. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- World Resources Institute. (2000a). Weight of nations: Material outflows from industrial economies. Washington, DC: Author.
- World Resources Institute. (2000b). World resources, 2000-2001: People and ecosystems. Washington, DC: Author.
- World Resources Institute. (2001). Understanding the forest resources assessment 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
- World Resources Institute. (2003). World resources 2002-2004: Decisions for the earth: Balance, voice, and power. Washington, DC: Author.
Organization & Environment, Vol. 18, No. 2,
141-162 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026605276197
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. E. King Jr
(Dis)Missing the Obvious: Will Mainstream Management Research Ever Take Religion Seriously?
Journal of Management Inquiry,
September 1, 2008;
17(3):
214 - 224.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. R. Cohen
Escaping the False Binary of Nature and Culture Through Connection: Richard White's The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River
Organization Environment,
December 1, 2005;
18(4):
445 - 457.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
