Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minteer, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Appraisal of the Critique of Anthropocentrism and Three Lesser Known Themes in Lynn White’s "The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis"

Ben A. Minteer

Arizona State University

Robert E. Manning

University of Vermont

Lynn White Jr.’s essay, "The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis," which first appeared in Science in 1967, has long been a cornerstone in the environmental studies literature. Yet subsequent research in the natural and social sciences, as well as in the environmental humanities, challenges many of White’s key assumptions and claims in this classic article including the uniquely dynamic presence of humans within a stable natural order, the pernicious metaphysical and moral implications of agriculture, the antiecological implications of democracy, and the direct linkage between the worldview of philosophical humanism (anthropocentrism) and environmental destruction. Although still relevant to current discussions about the cultural and historical roots of scientific and technological problems, White’s essay requires critical revision if it is to remain useful in clarifying the historical and cultural foundations of contemporary ecological attitudes and behaviors.

Key Words: Lynn White Jr. • ecological change • critique of anthropocentrism • environmental ethics • environmental history

References

  • Adams, C. (1997). "Mad cow" disease and the animal industrial complex. Organization & Environment, 10, 26-51.[Abstract]
  • Attfield, R. (1983). Christian attitudes to nature. Journal of the History of Ideas, 44, 369-386.
  • Barbour, I. G. (Ed.). (1973). Western man and environmental ethics: Attitudes toward nature and technology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Botkin, D. B. (1990). Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Brulle, R. J. (2000). Agency, democracy, and nature: The U.S. environmental movement from a critical theory perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Callicott, J. B. (1995). Environmental philosophy is environmental activism: The most radical and effective kind. In D. E. Marietta & L. E. Embree (Eds.), Environmental philosophy and environmental activism (pp. 19-35). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Callicott, J. B. (1999). Beyond the land ethic. More essays in environmental philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Callicott, J. B. (2003). The implication of the "Shifting Paradigm" in ecology for paradigm shifts in the philosophy of conservation. In B. A. Minteer & R. E. Manning (Eds.), Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground (pp. 239-261). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1972). Is it too late? A theology of ecology. Beverley Hills, CA: Bruce.
  • Cronon, W. (Ed.). (1996). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69-90). New York: Norton.
  • Denevan, W. M. (1992). The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 82(3), 369-385.[CrossRef]
  • DeWitt, C. B. (1998). Caring for creation: Responsible stewardship of God’s handiwork (J. W. Skillen & L. E. Lugo, Eds.). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
  • Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1992). American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement, 1970-1990. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Egan, M. (2002). The social significance of the environmental crisis. Organization & Environment, 15, 443-457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Egerton, F. N. (1973). Changing concepts of the balance of nature. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 48(2), 322-350.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ehrenfeld, D. (1978). The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ehrlich, P. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine.
  • Flader, S. (2003). Building conservation on the land: Aldo Leopold and the tensions of professionalism and citizenship. In B. A. Minteer & R. E. Manning (Eds.), Reconstructing conservation (pp. 115-132). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Freyfogle, E. T. (1998). Bounded people, boundless lands: Envisioning a new land ethic. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater.
  • Gaines, J., & Jermier, J. M. (2000). Animal inequality and organizations. Organization & Environment, 13, 426-428.[Free Full Text]
  • Gomez-Pompa, A., & Kaus, A. (1992). Taming the wilderness myth. BioScience, 42, 271-279.[CrossRef]
  • Gottlieb, R. (1993). Forcing the spring: The transformation of the American environmental movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Guber, D. L. (2003). The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gundersen, A. (1995). The environmental promise of democratic deliberation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Resilience in theory and practice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 425-439.[CrossRef]
  • Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of regional ecosystems. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hargrove, E. C. (Ed.). (1992). Religion and environmental crisis. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Hessel, D. T., & Reuther, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). Christianity and ecology: Seeking the well-being of earth and humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 445-456.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Judd, R. W. (1997). Common lands, common people: The origins of conservation in New England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Katz, E. (1997). Nature as subject: Human obligation and natural community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1997). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater.
  • Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (Eds). (1996). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Krech, S., III. (1999). The ecological Indian: Myth and history. New York: Norton.
  • Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Light, A., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1996). Environmental pragmatism. London: Routledge.
  • Livingstone, D. N. (1994). The historical roots of our ecological crisis: A reassessment. Fides et Historia, 26, 38-55.
  • Manning, R. E. (2003). Social climate change: A sociology of environmental philosophy. In B. A. Minteer & R. E. Manning (Eds.), Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground (pp. 207-222). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Marangudakis, M. (2001). The medieval roots of our environmental crisis. Environmental Ethics, 23, 243-260.
  • McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
  • McKibben, B. (2003). Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Times Books.
  • Miller, C. (2001). Gifford Pinchot and the making of modern environmentalism. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Minteer, B. A. (2001). Intrinsic value for pragmatists? Environmental Ethics, 23, 57-75.
  • Minteer, B. A., & Manning, R. E. (1999). Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature. Environmental Ethics, 21, 191-207.
  • Minteer, B. A., & Manning, R. E. (2000). Convergence in environmental values: An empirical and conceptual defense. Ethics, Place, and Environment, 3, 47-60.
  • Minteer, B. A., & Taylor, B. P. (Eds.). (2002). Democracy and the claims of nature: Critical perspectives for a new century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Moncrief, L. W. (1970). The cultural basis of our environmental crisis. Science, 170, 508-512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Montmarquet, J. A. (1989). The idea of agrarianism: From hunter-gatherer to agrarian radical in Western culture. Moscow: University of Idaho Press.
  • Nash, J. A. (1991). Loving nature: Ecological integrity and Christian responsibility. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
  • Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6, 131-148.
  • Norton, B. G. (1987). Why preserve natural variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Norton, B. G. (1991). Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Norton, B. G. (2003). Conservation: Moral crusade or environmental public policy? In B. A. Minteer & R. E. Manning (Eds.), Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground (pp. 187-205). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Passmore, J. (1974). Man’s responsibility for nature: Ecological problems and Western traditions. New York: Scribner.
  • Pickett, S.T. A.,& Ostfeld, R. S. (1995). The shifting paradigm in ecology. In R. L. Knight & S. H. Bates (Eds.), A new century for natural resources management (pp. 261-277). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Pyne, S. J. (1997). Fire in America: A cultural history of wildland and rural fire. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Redman, C. (1999). Human impact on ancient environments. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Rolston, H., III. (1988). Environmental ethics: Duties to and values in the natural world. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Rolston, H., III. (1994). Conserving natural value. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Routley, R. (1973). Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic? Proceedings, 15th World Congress of Philosophy, 1, 205-210.
  • Sagoff, M. (1988). The economy of the earth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Santmire, P. H. (1985). The travail of nature: The ambiguous ecological promise of Christian theology. Philadelphia: Fortress.
  • Sherlock, R., & Morrey, J. D. (Eds.). (2002). Ethical issues in biotechnology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Shutkin, W. (2000). The land that could be: Environmentalism and democracy in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Smith, K. K. (2003). Wendell Berry and the agrarian tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Steffen, L. H. (1992). In defense of dominion. Environmental Ethics, 14, 63-80.
  • Stoll, S. (2002). Larding the lean earth: Soil and society in nineteenth-century America. New York: Hill & Wang.
  • Taylor, B. P. (1996). America’s bachelor uncle: Thoreau and the American polity. Lawrence: University press of Kansas.
  • Taylor, P. W. (1986). Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world: A history of the modern sensibility. New York: Pantheon.
  • Thompson, P. B. (1995). The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. New York: Routledge.
  • Thompson, P. B. (2003). Expanding the conservation tradition: The agrarian vision. In B. A. Minteer & R. E. Manning (Eds.), Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground (pp. 77-92). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671-677.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Valencius, C. B. (2002). The health of the country: How American settlers understood themselves and their land. New York: Basic Books.
  • Vitek, W., & Jackson, W. (Eds.).(1996). Rooted in the land: Essays on community and place. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Westra, L. (1998). Living in integrity: A global ethic to restore a fragmented earth. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • White, L., Jr. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203-1207.[Free Full Text]
  • Whitney, E. (1993). Lynn White, ecotheology, and history. Environmental Ethics, 15, 151-169.
  • Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Worster, D. (2001). A river running west: The life of John Wesley Powell. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Wu, J., & Loucks, O. L. (1995). From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 439-466.[CrossRef]

Organization & Environment, Vol. 18, No. 2, 163-176 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026605276196


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. M. Jermier
Exploring Deep Subjectivity in Sociology and Organizational Studies: The Contributions of William Catton and Riley Dunlap on Paradigm Change
Organization Environment, December 1, 2008; 21(4): 460 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
B. R. Cohen
Escaping the False Binary of Nature and Culture Through Connection: Richard White's The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River
Organization Environment, December 1, 2005; 18(4): 445 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minteer, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?