|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Ecologically Unequal Exchange and Deforestation: A Cross-National Analysis of Forestry Export Flows
John M. Shandra
State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY, USA, jshandra{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu
Christopher Leckband
State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY, USA
Bruce London
Clark University,Worcester, MA, USA
The theory of ecologically unequal exchange suggests that rich nations are able to externalize their resource demands and environmental degradation onto the poor nations of the world through the vertical flow of exports. However, there has been no cross-national research that examines if forestry export flows from poor to rich nations is associated with higher rates of deforestation in poor nations. As such, we seek to address this gap in the literature by constructing cross-national regression models of forest loss from 1990 to 2005 for a sample of 60 poor nations. In doing so, we find substantial support for ecologically unequal exchange theory that poor nations with higher levels of forestry export flows to rich nations tend to have higher rates of deforestation.We also find that a number of other factors are related to deforestation. These include international nongovernmental organizations, democracy, total forestry production, total population growth, rural population growth, and tropical climate. We conclude with a discussion of the findings, theoretical implications, methodological implications, policy suggestions, and possible directions for future research.
Key Words: deforestation unequal exchange cross-national
References
- Allen, J., & Barnes, D. ( 1985). The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 75, 163-184.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Anderson, J., & Lindroth, M. ( 2001). Ecologically unsustainable trade. Ecological Economics, 37, 113-122.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Barbosa, L.C. ( 2001). The Brazilian Amazon rainforest. New York: University of America Press.
- Boli, J., & Thomas, G.M. ( 1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Bollen, K., & Paxton, P. ( 2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 58-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bryant, R.L., & Bailey, S. ( 1997). Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.
- Bunker, S. ( 1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Burns, T.J., Kick, E.L., & Davis, B.L. ( 2003). Theorizing and rethinking linkages between the natural environment and the modern world system: Deforestation in the late 20th century. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9, 357-390.
- Chase-Dunn, C., Kawano, Y., & Brewer, B. ( 2000). Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65, 77-95.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Dauvergne, P. ( 1994). The politics of deforestation in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 66, 497-518.[Web of Science]
- Ehrhardt-Martinez, K. ( 1998). Social determinants of deforestation in developing countries. Social Forces, 77, 567-586.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Crenshaw, E.M., & Jenkins, J.C. ( 2002). Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 226-243.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. ( 2004). One with nineveh: Politics, consumption, and the human future. New York: Island Press.
- Emmanuel, A. ( 1972). Unequal exchange. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- Evans, P. ( 1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Amann, C. ( 2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analyzing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment, 23, 7-47.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ( 2005). Global forest resources assessment 2005: Progress towards sustainable forest management (Food and Agriculture Organization Forestry Paper No. 147). Rome: Author.
- Frank, A.G. ( 1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- Frank, D.J. ( 1999). The social bases of environmental treaty ratification. Sociological Inquiry, 69, 523-550.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Frank, D.J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. ( 2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96-116.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Freedom House. (1997). Freedom in the world: 1996-1997. New York: Freedom House.
- Frey, R.S. ( 2003). The transfer of core-based hazardous production processes to the export processing zones of the periphery: The Maquiladora centers of Northern Mexico. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9, 317-356.
- Galtung, J. ( 1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8, 81-117.[Free Full Text]
- George, S. ( 1992). The debt boomerang. Boulder, CO: Pluto Press.
- George, S., & Sabelli, F. ( 1994). Faith and credit: The World Banks secular empire. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Giljum, S. ( 2004). Trade, material flows and economic development in the south: The example of Chile. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8, 241-261.[CrossRef]
- Giljum, S., & Eisenmenger, N. (2004). North-South trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: A biophysical perspective. Journal of Environment & Development, 13, 73-100.[CrossRef]
- Homer-Dixon, T. ( 1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Hornborg, A. ( 2003). Cornucopia or zero-sum game? The epistemology of sustainability. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9, 205-218.
- Hurst, P. ( 1990). Rainforest politics. London: Zed Books.
- Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2003.) Consumption and environmental degradation: A cross-national analysis of the ecological footprint. Social Problems, 50, 374-394.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2006). Unequal exchange and environmental degradation: A theoretical proposition and cross-national study of deforestation. Rural Sociology, 71, 685-712.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2008). Structural integration and the trees: An analysis of deforestation in less-developed countries, 1990-2005. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 503-527.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2009a). Foreign direct investment and the environment, the mitigating influence of institutional and civil society factors, and relationships between industrial pollution and human health: A panel study of less-developed countries. Organization & Environment, 22, 135-157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2009b). The sociology of unequal exchange in ecological context: A panel study of lower income countries, 1975-2000. Sociological Forum, 24, 22-46.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jorgenson, A.K., & Burns, T.J. ( 2007). Effects of rural and urban populations and national development on deforestation in less developed countries, 1990-2000. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 460-482.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jorgenson, A.K., & Rice, J. ( 2005). Structural dynamics of international trade and material consumption: A cross-national study of the ecological footprints of less-developed countries. Journal of World-Systems Research, 11, 57-77.
- Kahn, J.R., & McDonald, J.A. (1994). International debt and deforestation. In K. Brown & D. Pearce (Eds.), The causes of tropical deforestation (pp. 57-67). London: University College London Press.
- Karliner, J. ( 1997). The corporate planet. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
- Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. ( 1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. ( 2006). Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly, 50, 935-956.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- London, B., & Ross, R.J.S. ( 1995). The political sociology of foreign direct investment: Global capitalism and capital mobility, 1965-1980. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 36, 198-219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Madeley, J. ( 1999). Big business and poor peoples: The impact of transnational corporations on the worlds poor. London: Zed Books.
- Marquart-Pyatt, S. ( 2004). A cross-national analysis of deforestation, debt, state fiscal capacity, and the environmental Kuznets Curve. International Journal of Sociology, 34, 33-51.
- Muradian, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2001). Trade and the environment from a "southern perspective." Ecological Economics, 36, 281-297.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Midlarsky, M.I. ( 1998). Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Peace Research, 35, 341-361.[Abstract]
- Mohan, G. ( 2001). The environmental impacts of adjustment. In G. Mohan, B. M. Brown, & A. B. Zack-Williams (Eds.), Structural adjustment: Theory, practice, and impacts (pp. 95-117). New York: Routledge.
- Moore, S., Teixeira, A.C., & Shiell, A. ( 2006). The health of nations in a global context: Trade, global stratification, and infant mortality rates. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 165-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Paxton, P. ( 2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67, 254-277.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Peet, R. ( 2003). The unholy trinity: The International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization. London: Zed Books.
- Polity IV Project. (2005). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions. College Park: University of Maryland.
- Prebisch, R. ( 1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations.
- Princen, T. ( 1994). Non-governmental organizations: Creating a niche in environment diplomacy. In T. Princen & M. Finger (Eds.), Environmental NGOs in world politics: Linking the local and the global (pp. 138-167). New York: Routledge.
- Rice, J. ( 2007a). Ecological unequal exchange: Consumption, equity and unsustainable structural relationships within the global economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48, 43-72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rice, J. ( 2007b). Ecological unequal exchange: International trade and uneven utilization of environmental space in the world system. Social Forces, 85, 1369-1392.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Rich, B.A. ( 1994). Mortgaging the earth: The World Bank, environmental impoverishment, and the crisis of development. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Roberts, J.T., & Parks, B.C. ( 2007). Fueling injustice: Globalization, ecologically unequal exchange, and climate change. Globalizations, 4, 193-210.[CrossRef]
- Rock, M. ( 1996). The stork, the plow, rural social structure, and tropical deforestation in poor countries. Ecological Economics, 18, 113-131.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rudel, T. ( 1989). Population, development, and tropical deforestation: A cross-national study. Rural Sociology, 54, 327-338.[Web of Science]
- Rudel, T. ( 1993). Tropical deforestation: Small farmers and land clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rudel, T. ( 2005). Tropical forests: Regional paths of destruction and regeneration in the late twentieth century. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rudel, T., & Roper, J. ( 1997). The paths to rain forest destruction: Cross-national patterns of tropical deforestation, 1975-1990. World Development, 25, 53-65.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Schofer, E., & Hironaka, A. ( 2005). The effects of world society on environmental outcomes. Social Forces, 84, 25-47.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Shandra, J.M. ( 2007a). Economic dependency, repression, and deforestation: A cross-national analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 543-572.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Shandra, J.M. ( 2007b). Non-governmental organizations and deforestation: Good, bad, or irrelevant?" Social Science Quarterly, 88, 665-689.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Shandra, J.M. ( 2007c). The world polity and deforestation: A cross-national analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48, 5-28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shandra, J.M., Restivo, M., & London, B. ( 2008). Non-governmental organizations and deforestation: Reconsidering the cross-national evidence. International Review of Modern Sociology, 34, 109-132.
- Shandra, J.M., Shandra, C.L., & London, B. ( 2008). Women, non-governmental organizations, and deforestation: A cross-national study. Population and Environment, 38, 48-72.
- Shandra, J.M., Shor, E., & London, B. ( 2008). Debt, structural adjustment, and organic water pollution: A cross-national analysis. Organization & Environment, 21, 38-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shandra, J.M., Shor, E., & London, B. ( 2009). World polity, unequal exchange, and organic water pollution: A cross-national analysis. Human Ecology Review, 16, 51-64.
- Smith, D.A. 1996. Third World Cities in Global perspective: The Political Economy of Uneven Development. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Smith, J. ( 2004). Exploring connections between globalization and political mobilization. Journal of World-Systems Research, 1, 255-285.
- Smith, J., & Wiest, D. ( 2005). The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces, 84, 632-652.
- Tockman, J. ( 2001). The International Monetary Fund: Funding deforestation. Washington, DC: American Lands Alliance.
- United Nations. (2008). Commodity trade statistics database. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://comtrade.un.org/db/
- Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press.
- World Bank. (2003). World development indicators. Washington, DC: Compact Disk.
- World Resources Institute. (2005). World resources 2005: The wealth of the poor. Washington, DC: Author.
- York, R. ( 2007). Structural influences on energy production in South and East Asia, 1971-2002. Sociological Forum, 22, 532.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- York, R., Rosa, E.A., & Dietz, T. ( 2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279-300.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
This version was published on September
1, 2009
Organization & Environment, Vol. 22, No. 3,
293-310 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026609343097

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|