This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1086026609333419v1 22/1/34    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McCormick, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

From "Politico-Scientists" to Democratizing Science Movements: The Changing Climate of Citizens and Science

University of Pennsylvania

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sabmc{at}whartan.upenn.edu.

	Abstract

The Committee for Nuclear Information (CNI) was one of the first movements to translate expert knowledge to the public. It was led by "politico-scientists" who meant to advance an ethics of science by contributing to public understanding. Since then, citizens have taken research into their own hands, using it to frame issues, challenge corporate practices, and change policy. Movement methods that respond to consistent activist concerns about science are reflected in "democratizing science movements" (DSMs) that have grown, expanded, and changed in the past 50 years. This article compares the CNI to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, a group of organizations that have critiqued the hazardous ingredients in personal care products. The aim is to update our understanding of how movements use science to protect health and improve the environment since the CNI. Like CNI, Campaign activists have used science to educate the public about hazardous exposures; however, the Campaign reflects that over time, lay people have become more central to scientific production as well as more able to use it without the assistance of experts. It is argued that in Commoner’s time scientists focused on translating results and meanings for lay audiences whereas today, movements use science to heighten the political nature of the issue through reframing.

First published on April 9, 2009, doi:10.1177/1086026609333419

Organization & Environment 2009;22:34.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Rosa Review of Chris Jordan's Photographic and Computer Image Exhibition, Running the Numbers, Curated by Chris Bruce, Director of the Washington State University Museum of Art Organization Environment, September 1, 2009; 22(3): 327 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]