Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization & Environment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Corporate Interest and Trade Liberalization

The North American Free Trade Agreement and Environmental Protection

Perry Grossman

New York University

This article examines rhetoric by corporations about the inclusion of environmental issues in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It provides a greater understanding of corporate pressure on regulatory measures by indicating how corporate actions change in relation to social movement and state actions. The author develops a cultural political economy perspective to show how issues are not fixed but are shaped by power relations and ongoing meaning construction. In doing so, he argues for the integration of theories of the firm with theories of the state to reveal the relationship between organizations and their social and political environment. The author shows how corporate rhetoric in the NAFTA debate does not fit neatly into prevailing theories of organizational and political sociology and suggests, instead, a political economy perspective that indicates a dynamic cultural process by which corporations attempt to ensure profit maximization under changing circumstances.

Organization & Environment, Vol. 13, No. 1, 61-85 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1086026600131003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
M. S. Carolan
Making Patents and Intellectual Property Work: The Asymmetrical "Harmonization" of TRIPS
Organization Environment, September 1, 2008; 21(3): 295 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
H.-A. Van Der Heijden
Globalization, Environmental Movements, and International Political Opportunity Structures
Organization Environment, March 1, 2006; 19(1): 28 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. J. Melo and S. A. Wolf
Empirical Assessment of Eco-Certification: The Case of Ecuadorian Bananas
Organization Environment, September 1, 2005; 18(3): 287 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. Oliver
The Treadmill of Production Under NAFTA: Multilateral Trade, Environmental Regulation, and National Sovereignty
Organization Environment, March 1, 2005; 18(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
D. J. Davidson and S. Frickel
Understanding Environmental Governance: A Critical Review
Organization Environment, December 1, 2004; 17(4): 471 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]